Sex & Justice

Josh Rowzee

3/3/16

A.P. Gov

Mrs.Gordon

Sex&Justice

Prompt 1.

An “high-tech lynching” is where somebody is making public execution that can basically ruin somebody career. Clarence Thomas seemed guilty to me from the get go.During the video during the beginning of the video he had always claimed that he never did that sort of thing and if he did it it really didn’t mean it. He always claimed during the video that he was “falsely accused” which would make sense for a person that actually committed the crime of sexual harassment. I believe Professor Hill 100% because I don’t that should would go through all this trouble just to stop this man’s career. Plus I don’t that if she wasn’t telling the truth would you think that she would tell all her friends. While all those men were integrating Clarence Thomas they never once had asked him actually good questions but only really told him about Prof.Hill statement which really shouldn’t be allowed because he would've been asked the same questions as her if he wasn't a man. That’s probably the reason why they believed Thomas instead of Hill.

Prompt 2

I feel that people who actually believed that Clarence actually had didn’t do it. I would like to know where they got any of their information from. Because women back then didn’t always go into a federal court and say a man had sexual harassed her. That takes a lot of integrity to do that. I don’t think that Joseph McCarthy case has anything to do with Clarence Thomas because his case had to deal with witch hunt and Thomas’s case had to deal with sexual harassment. With McCarthy and Clarence they both got to stay in office just because they were men.